Great, now we have to become digital copyright experts

0


when the news came When AI heavyweights OpenAI and Axel Springer reached a financial agreement and partnership last year, it boded well for cohesion between the people who write the words and the tech companies that use them to help build and train artificial intelligence models. It appeared. For reference, OpenAI also signed an agreement with AP at that time.

Then as the year ended, The New York Times sued OpenAI and its backer Microsoft, alleging that the AI ​​company’s generic AI models “weigh millions of The Times’s copyrighted news articles, in-depth investigations, opinion pieces, reviews, Were created by copying and using.” -For guidance, and much more.” What the Times considers “unlawful use” [its] Work to create an artificial intelligence product, OpenAI may generate output that reproduces the Times’ content verbatim, closely summarizes it, and mimics its expressive style, as several examples show. .


The exchange discovers startups, markets and money.

Read it every morning on TechCrunch+ or get the Exchange newsletter every Saturday.


The Times said in its lawsuit that it objected “after discovering that the defendants were using Times content without permission to develop their models and tools” and that “negotiations with OpenAI did not result in a resolution.”

How to balance the need to respect copyright And To ensure that AI development is not hindered, the answer will not be given immediately. But the agreements and more controversial disputes between creators and AI companies, which want to ingest and use that work to build artificial intelligence models, create an unhappy moment for both sides of the conflict. Tech companies are busy creating new generative AI models trained on data, including copyright-protected content in their software products; It’s worth noting that Microsoft is the leader in that particular task. And media companies that have spent massive amounts of time building an archive of reported and otherwise produced content are angry that their efforts are being subsumed into machines that give nothing back to those in charge. who provided their training data.



Source link

About Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *